Claims

Self-explanation prompting is potentially effective across a range of instructional conditions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q4
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-10-13 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? Based on the moderator analyses, the authors conclude that self-explanation prompts show promise as an intervention across varied instructional conditions rather than only in narrow settings. → Bisra 2018

Evidence

Bisra 2018

Bisra, K., Liu, Q., Nesbit, J. C., Salimi, F., & Winne, P. H. (2018). Inducing Self-Explanation: a Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 703–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9434-x

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The meta-analysis authors' summary conclusion from analyzing the 69 effect sizes and 20 moderators; they report self-explanation prompts are "a potentially powerful intervention across a range of instructional conditions."

"We found that self-explanation prompts are a potentially powerful intervention across a range of instructional conditions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-explanation-effective-across-instructional-conditions
title Self-explanation prompting is potentially effective across a range of instructional conditions
description Self-explanation prompting is potentially effective across a range of instructional conditions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
source_checked 2026-10-13
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bisra-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.