Effect size heterogeneity in self-management interventions may be explained by grade level, disability status, and general versus special education setting¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The authors propose that heterogeneity in self-management intervention effect sizes may be explained by who the intervention was carried out with (grade level, disability status) and in what setting (general versus special education). → Briesch 2019
Evidence¶
Briesch 2019¶
Briesch, A.M., Daniels, B. & Beneville, M. (2019). Unpacking the Term “Self-Management”: Understanding Intervention Applications Within the School-Based Literature. J Behav Educ 28, 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9303-1
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Authors' interpretation offered in the systematic review of 56 single-case studies: "This heterogeneity may be explained by differences in characteristics" of the recipients and settings. This is an explanatory hypothesis, not a tested moderator analysis in the available text.
"This heterogeneity may be explained by differences in characteristics such as who the intervention was carried out with (e.g., grade level, disability status) or in what setting (e.g., general versus special education)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self-determination skills instruction for students with disabilities increases self-determination on some measures but not others — a broader claim this one bears on
- Single-case effects of self-management interventions are moderated by student race and special education status, with more pronounced effects for African American students and students receiving special education services — related
- Single-case effects of self-management interventions are not moderated by intervention characteristics (duration, fidelity assessment, fidelity method, or training) — related
- Self-management intervention configurations show strong mean effect sizes but substantial effect size heterogeneity in single-case research — related
- All students in the self-determination skill intervention achieved their goals at better than average levels — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-management-heterogeneity-moderators-grade-disability-setting |
title |
Effect size heterogeneity in self-management interventions may be explained by grade level, disability status, and general versus special education setting |
description |
Effect size heterogeneity in self-management interventions may be explained by grade level, disability status, and general versus special education setting |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — briesch-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.