Claims

Effect size heterogeneity in self-management interventions may be explained by grade level, disability status, and general versus special education setting

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The authors propose that heterogeneity in self-management intervention effect sizes may be explained by who the intervention was carried out with (grade level, disability status) and in what setting (general versus special education). → Briesch 2019

Evidence

Briesch 2019

Briesch, A.M., Daniels, B. & Beneville, M. (2019). Unpacking the Term “Self-Management”: Understanding Intervention Applications Within the School-Based Literature. J Behav Educ 28, 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9303-1

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Authors' interpretation offered in the systematic review of 56 single-case studies: "This heterogeneity may be explained by differences in characteristics" of the recipients and settings. This is an explanatory hypothesis, not a tested moderator analysis in the available text.

"This heterogeneity may be explained by differences in characteristics such as who the intervention was carried out with (e.g., grade level, disability status) or in what setting (e.g., general versus special education)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-management-heterogeneity-moderators-grade-disability-setting
title Effect size heterogeneity in self-management interventions may be explained by grade level, disability status, and general versus special education setting
description Effect size heterogeneity in self-management interventions may be explained by grade level, disability status, and general versus special education setting
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — briesch-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.