Claims

Self-selected scaffolding customization yields higher effects than fixed time interval and performance-adapted customization

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 When scaffolding was customized based on self-selection, effect sizes (g = 0.519) were higher than fixed time interval (g = 0.376) and performance-adaptation (g = 0.434). → Nam Ju Kim 2018

Evidence

Nam Ju Kim 2018

Nam Ju Kim, Brian R. Belland, & Andrew E. Walker. (2018). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for STEM Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup analysis of the scaffolding customization method moderator (performance-adapted, self-selected, fixed time interval) in the Bayesian meta-analysis. The article notes few studies have investigated which customization method has the highest effects in PBL.

"When scaffolding was customized based on self-selection, the effect sizes of scaffolding were higher ( g = 0.519, 95% CrI = 0.167 to 0.989) than other scaffolding customization methods: fixed time interval (g = 0.376, 95% CrI = 0.018 to 0.713) and performance-adaption (g = 0.434, 95% CrI = 0.013 to 0.863)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-selected-customization-highest-effect
title Self-selected scaffolding customization yields higher effects than fixed time interval and performance-adapted customization
description Self-selected scaffolding customization yields higher effects than fixed time interval and performance-adapted customization
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nam-ju-kim-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.