Self-selected scaffolding customization yields higher effects than fixed time interval and performance-adapted customization¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 When scaffolding was customized based on self-selection, effect sizes (g = 0.519) were higher than fixed time interval (g = 0.376) and performance-adaptation (g = 0.434). → Nam Ju Kim 2018
Evidence¶
Nam Ju Kim 2018¶
Nam Ju Kim, Brian R. Belland, & Andrew E. Walker. (2018). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for STEM Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3
Subgroup analysis of the scaffolding customization method moderator (performance-adapted, self-selected, fixed time interval) in the Bayesian meta-analysis. The article notes few studies have investigated which customization method has the highest effects in PBL.
"When scaffolding was customized based on self-selection, the effect sizes of scaffolding were higher ( g = 0.519, 95% CrI = 0.167 to 0.989) than other scaffolding customization methods: fixed time interval (g = 0.376, 95% CrI = 0.018 to 0.713) and performance-adaption (g = 0.434, 95% CrI = 0.013 to 0.863)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Computer-based scaffolding improves cognitive outcomes in problem-based learning in STEM education with an overall effect of g = 0.385 — a broader claim this one bears on
- Customized scaffolding (fading/adding) outperforms non-customized scaffolding in PBL-STEM, with fading/adding highest at g = 0.590 — related
- System-controlled adaptive instruction does not necessarily yield higher transfer than nonadaptive static approaches — related
- Fading support promotes the transfer of responsibility from instructor to learner. — related
- Adaptive fading with periodic reinforcement yields higher independence than fixed-high or linear-decay scaffolding in simulation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-selected-customization-highest-effect |
title |
Self-selected scaffolding customization yields higher effects than fixed time interval and performance-adapted customization |
description |
Self-selected scaffolding customization yields higher effects than fixed time interval and performance-adapted customization |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nam-ju-kim-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.