High school students taught with self-study followed by discussion achieved higher immediate retention and near-transfer scores than those taught with lecture followed by discussion¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i2–i3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Self-study students scored higher on immediate retention than lecture students (d = 0.47). → Jaeseo Lim and Jooyong Park 2026
q3 i3 Self-study students scored higher on immediate near-transfer than lecture students (d = 1.03). → Jaeseo Lim and Jooyong Park 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Jaeseo Lim and Jooyong Park 2026¶
Jaeseo Lim and Jooyong Park (2026). Self-study followed by discussion enhances learning for high school students. Instructional Science (2026) 54:56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09801-7
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Experiment with 73 grade-12 South Korean students randomly assigned to lecture-followed-by-discussion (n = 35) or self-study-followed-by-discussion (n = 38). The stated significant difference was "statistically significant, t(71) = 2.12, p = .038, d = 0.47, indicating a moderate effect size."
"Students in the self-study condition (M = 4.32, SD = 1.38) achieved higher immediate retention scores than those in the lecture condition (M = 3.63, SD = 1.40), as shown in Table 2."
Jaeseo Lim and Jooyong Park 2026 (2)¶
Jaeseo Lim and Jooyong Park (2026). Self-study followed by discussion enhances learning for high school students. Instructional Science (2026) 54:56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09801-7
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Same randomized two-condition experiment; immediate near-transfer contrast reported as "statistically significant, t(71) = 4.42, p < .001, d = 1.03, indicating a large effect" (transfer items worth 18 points).
"Students in the self-study condition (M = 9.40, SD = 2.75) outperformed those in the lecture condition (M = 6.40, SD = 3.04)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The self-study-before-discussion advantage persisted at one-week delayed tests, with lecture-condition scores declining over time while self-study-condition scores remained stable — related
- Active Learning Improves Exam Performance — a broader claim this one bears on
- In one study of 37 thermodynamics freshmen, a CLT-based instructional design yields higher retention and transfer scores than lecturer-designed instruction, controlling for prior knowledge and memory span — related
- No significant difference between groups on the thermodynamics achievement post-test or cognitive load scale after CLT-based versus lecturer-designed instruction — related
- Eight-day review improved a five-week science test versus one-day review in a simulated university classroom — related
- Students in active classrooms scored higher on tests of learning than students in passive lectures (0.46 SD higher, P < 0.001) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-study-discussion-immediate-retention-transfer-high-school |
title |
High school students taught with self-study followed by discussion achieved higher immediate retention and near-transfer scores than those taught with lecture followed by discussion |
description |
High school students taught with self-study followed by discussion achieved higher immediate retention and near-transfer scores than those taught with lecture followed by discussion |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — jaeseo-lim-and-jooyong-park-2026, jaeseo-lim-and-jooyong-park-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.