Mastery orientation relates to classroom behavioral self-regulation only indirectly via executive functions, while trait beliefs relate mainly directly¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? SEM showed a significant indirect relation of goal orientation with CBSR via EF (β = .13, p = .017) and no direct relation. → Compagnoni 2019
q3 i? Trait beliefs showed a significant total effect on CBSR (β = .22, p = .034) explained mainly by a direct path. → Compagnoni 2019 (2)
Evidence¶
Compagnoni 2019¶
Compagnoni, M., Karlen, Y., & Maag Merki, K. (2019). Play it safe or play to learn: mindsets and behavioral self-regulation in kindergarten. Metacognition and Learning, 14, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09190-y
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Structural equation model (N = 147) with trait beliefs and goal orientations as latent variables, fit indices χ2(23) = 30.21, RMSEA = .05, CFI = .96; EF related significantly with CBSR (β = .47).
"The model showed no total or direct relation of g oal orientations with CBSR, but there was a significant indirect relation via EF as a mediating variable ( β =. 1 3 , p = .017)."
Compagnoni 2019 (2)¶
Compagnoni, M., Karlen, Y., & Maag Merki, K. (2019). Play it safe or play to learn: mindsets and behavioral self-regulation in kindergarten. Metacognition and Learning, 14, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09190-y
q3 · i? · associational · r2
In the same SEM, the trait beliefs–CBSR relation was explained mainly through a direct path and only a weak indirect path via goal orientations and EF, so hypothesis H2c was only partly supported.
"Trait beliefs showed no significant d irect relation with EF or CBSR, but there was a significant total effect of β =. 2 2( p = .034) which can be explained by a direct path to CBSR (β =. 1 8 ,p = .090)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Goal Orientation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Mindset — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- In kindergarteners, trait beliefs and goal orientations form two separate but related factors rather than a coherent growth/fixed mindset — related
- Kindergarteners who believe traits are malleable show better classroom behavioral self-regulation than children with a stable trait belief — related
- Kindergarteners with a mastery goal orientation show better executive functions than children with a performance orientation — related
- Mindsets relate to kindergarteners' achievement indirectly through executive functions and classroom behavioral self-regulation as mediators — related
- Malleable trait beliefs may be especially beneficial for classroom behavioral self-regulation among mastery-oriented children (marginal interaction) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sem-differential-paths-mindsets-cbsr |
title |
Mastery orientation relates to classroom behavioral self-regulation only indirectly via executive functions, while trait beliefs relate mainly directly |
description |
Mastery orientation relates to classroom behavioral self-regulation only indirectly via executive functions, while trait beliefs relate mainly directly |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — compagnoni-2019, compagnoni-2019-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.