Claims

Senior trainees scored approximately 30–40% higher than juniors on technical performance measures in simulation studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Where reported, technical performance favored more experienced trainees, with senior participants scoring approximately 30–40% higher than juniors on global rating scales or procedural checklists. → Gulnaz Nadia 2026

Evidence

Gulnaz Nadia 2026

Gulnaz Nadia, Soomro Faiza Hashim, Nazir Izza, Ansar Mehwish, Arshad Rabia. (2026). From operating room to leadership room: a systematic review of simulation-based interventions for leadership development in general surgery. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09486-z

q3 · i? · review · r3

Descriptive synthesis of technical performance outcomes across included studies with experience-level comparators (e.g., Moorthy et al. 2006; Goldenberg et al. 2018). The review reports seniors scored "approximately 30–40% higher than juniors on global rating scales or procedural checklists."

"Technical performance outcomes, where reported, favored more experienced trainees, with senior participants scoring approximately 30–40% higher than juniors on global rating scales or procedural checklists."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.