Claims

Standardizing each community separately exposes facts concealed when results are lumped together

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 1922 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The authors argue that keeping community results separate rather than combining them permits more intelligent treatment of the data because pooled results hide anomalies. → Walter F. Dearborn and Edward A. Lincoln 1922

Evidence

Walter F. Dearborn and Edward A. Lincoln 1922

Walter F. Dearborn and Edward A. Lincoln. (1922). How the Dearborn Intelligence Examination Standards Were Obtained. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075378

q1 · i? · associational · r1

The authors' concluding interpretive statement about the separate-community standardization method used for the Dearborn tests; no statistical test is reported for this claim.

"This method is especially valuable in that it exposes facts which are concealed when results are thrown together, and thus more intelligent treatment of the data is possible."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id separate-community-standardization-exposes-concealed-facts
title Standardizing each community separately exposes facts concealed when results are lumped together
description Standardizing each community separately exposes facts concealed when results are lumped together
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1922
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — walter-f-dearborn-and-edward-a-lincoln-1922

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.