Claims

The interaction between socio-economic status and treatment is statistically significant for mathematics achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The two–way interaction for SES- treatment F (6,221) = 2.346, p < 0.05 was statistically significant. → James and Folorunso 2012

Evidence

James and Folorunso 2012

Ajogbeje Oke James & Alonge Micheal Folorunso. (2012). Effect of Feedback and Remediation on Students’ Achievement in Junior Secondary School Mathematics. International Education Studies, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n5p153

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental study of 240 junior secondary two students in three Nigerian schools. The 3 x 2 x 3 ANCOVA revealed a significant two-way interaction between SES and treatment, F(6, 221) = 2.346, p < 0.05, suggesting that the effectiveness of feedback and remediation strategies may vary across socio-economic status groups.

"The two–way interaction for SES- treatment F (6,221) = 2.346, p < 0.05 was statistically significant"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.