Claims

The 70-80% ability subset was the only out-of-trend result, with a sudden improvement spike in the Facebook group and uniformly positive course ratings

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The Experiment group's 70-80% subset showed a sudden spike, improving 12.78%, almost double the immediately lower subset. → Shams 2014 q2 i? All surveyed students in the Experiment group's 70-80% subset replied that the course was very engaging. → Shams 2014 (2)

Evidence

Shams 2014

Shaila Shams. (2014). Efficacy of Online Social Networks on Language Teaching: A Bangladeshi Perspective. The IAFOR Journal of Education, Volume II - Issue II - Summer 2014. https://iafor.org/journal

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Subset analysis of the Experiment group's improvement by Start-test band (Figure 4), which otherwise showed an almost linear decrease in improvement as initial aptitude increased. Descriptive percentage only.

"There was however a sudden spike in improvement in this trend for the “70-80%” subset with almost double the improvement from the immediately lower subset (12.78%)"

Shams 2014 (2)

Shaila Shams. (2014). Efficacy of Online Social Networks on Language Teaching: A Bangladeshi Perspective. The IAFOR Journal of Education, Volume II - Issue II - Summer 2014. https://iafor.org/journal

q2 · i? · causal · r1

A follow-up query about how students in the Experiment group's 70-80% subset felt about the course; the article reports every respondent gave a positive answer. No survey instrument details are printed.

"100% of the students in this subset (70-80%) replied with a positive answer explaining that the course was very engaging."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.