Claims

Preschoolers severely underestimated by their teachers showed weaker fall-to-spring academic skill growth, significant for language and pre-literacy but not for math

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Subgroup slope comparison showed children underestimated by at least two standard deviations had weaker fall-spring skill relationships in language/pre-literacy; the math difference was not significant. → Baker Courtney N. 2015

Evidence

Baker Courtney N. 2015

Baker Courtney N., Tichovolsky Marianne H., Kupersmidt Janis B., Voegler-Lee Mary Ellen, Arnold David H. (2015). Teacher (Mis)Perceptions of Preschoolers' Academic Skills: Predictors and Associations With Longitudinal Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000008

q3 · i? · associational · r3

Exploratory subgroup slope comparison within the longitudinal HLM. "The relationship was similar for math outcomes, but the difference in slopes was not significant, zmath = −1.8, p = .07." Overestimation showed no significant patterns.

"the group of preschoolers who were underestimated by at least two standard deviations by their teachers had considerably weaker relationships between their fall and spring academic skills than peers whose skills were neither over- nor underestimated, suggesting perhaps that their growth was dampened by these considerable teacher underestimations, zlang and pre-lit= −2, p = .045"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id severe-teacher-underestimation-dampens-growth
title Preschoolers severely underestimated by their teachers showed weaker fall-to-spring academic skill growth, significant for language and pre-literacy but not for math
description Preschoolers severely underestimated by their teachers showed weaker fall-to-spring academic skill growth, significant for language and pre-literacy but not for math
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — baker-courtney-n-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.