Shifting is moderately to strongly associated with reading comprehension, with large associations when reading-specific shifting tasks are paired with literal comprehension measures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across 14 studies, most showed moderate to strong shifting-reading comprehension links, with six studies reporting large associations. → Ting Zhou 2026
q2 i? Large associations were found particularly when the shifting task required higher-order conceptual or verbal switching and the comprehension measure focused on literal comprehension. → Ting Zhou 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Ting Zhou 2026¶
Ting Zhou, Thuy Anh Nguyen, Aprezo Pardodi Maba, Damon Thomas, Young-Suk Grace Kim, Elizabeth J. Edwards. (2026). Executive Functions and Reading in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10160-5
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Qualitative synthesis of 14 shifting-reading comprehension studies: "Most studies showed moderate to strong links", with one exception reporting r = .15 using the general Multiple Classification Card Sorting Test and GORT; no pooled effect size is printed.
"Fourteen studies examined the relationship between shifting and reading comprehension. Most studies showed moderate to strong links, except one study reported a small association ( r=.15; Bock et al., 2018)"
Ting Zhou 2026 (2)¶
Ting Zhou, Thuy Anh Nguyen, Aprezo Pardodi Maba, Damon Thomas, Young-Suk Grace Kim, Elizabeth J. Edwards. (2026). Executive Functions and Reading in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10160-5
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Pattern across six studies reporting large associations (Barber et al., 2020; Cartwright, 2002; Cartwright et al., 2010, 2019, 2020; Niedo et al., 2014): large effects occurred "particularly when the shifting task required higher-order conceptual or verbal switching" with literal comprehension measures.
"The large effects were found across a variety of shifting tasks and reading comprehension assessments, particularly when the shifting task required higher-order conceptual or verbal switching (i.e., reading-specific shifting task), and the measure of comprehension focused on literal comprehension (e.g., WRMT Passage Comprehension or WJ Passage Comprehension)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Shifting is generally moderately to strongly associated with word reading, with reading-specific shifting tasks most strongly linked to accuracy-based word reading assessments — related
- Inhibition shows moderate to large associations with reading comprehension in most studies, but the association depends on the inhibition task used — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
shifting-reading-comprehension-moderate-strong |
title |
Shifting is moderately to strongly associated with reading comprehension, with large associations when reading-specific shifting tasks are paired with literal comprehension measures |
description |
Shifting is moderately to strongly associated with reading comprehension, with large associations when reading-specific shifting tasks are paired with literal comprehension measures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ting-zhou-2026, ting-zhou-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.