Claims

Single-session and multi-session experiential learning programs show comparable attitude improvements

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Both short-term (single-session) and long-term (multi-session) interventions significantly improved DAS scores, with no statistically significant between-group difference (p = 0.49). → Wong Ion Hong 2026

Evidence

Wong Ion Hong 2026

Wong Ion Hong, Gao Xiaoyu, Tan Zhengyi, Fang Yiping, Wang Qun, Lei Wai In, Van Iat Kio, Tan Meijing, Liu Ning, Wu Jianwei. (2026). The impact of experiential learning on healthcare students’ attitudes towards dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07573-w

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Subgroup meta-analysis comparing single-session programs (workshops, simulations, one-day activities) with multi-session or longitudinal programs. Short-term WMD = 8.51 and long-term WMD = 10.88 were both significant; the between-group difference was not (p = 0.49).

"Both short-term (WMD = 8.51, 95% CI: 3.63–13.39, p = 0.0006) and long-term (WMD = 10.88, 95% CI: 6.15–15.60, p < 0.001) interventions were associated with significant improvements in DAS scores (Fig. 4). The between-group difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.49)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.