Claims

Included e-learning programs were short (45 minutes to 4 hours), supporting feasibility of integration into hospital orientation or refresher training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Most included studies delivered the e-learning program in only 45 minutes to 2 hours, which the authors interpret as showing e-learning programs are feasible for integration into orientation/refresher training for hospital nurses. → Ding 2024

Evidence

Ding 2024

Ding, Y., Qian, J., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Effect of e‐learning program for improving nurse knowledge and practice towards managing pressure injuries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Nursing Open, 11, e2039. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2039

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Descriptive synthesis of intervention durations across the eight included trials (Table 1 reports a range of 45 min to 4 h). The authors' feasibility interpretation is their own, offered in the discussion without a test.

"We also found that most studies have conducted the program for only 45 min to 2 h. This shows that e‐learning programs are very feasible and can be integrated as a part of orientation/refresher training programs for the nurses in hospitals."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.