Claims

SI-PASS participants did not engage more with online exercises than controls in the RCT, but attendance correlated with online exercise engagement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2–q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No significant difference in online exercise completion between experimental and control groups (t(182) = .48, p = .63). → Puttaert 2025 q2 i2 Among SI-PASS students, meeting attendance correlated with online exercise engagement (r = .33), and online exercise engagement correlated strongly with exam performance (r = .75). → Puttaert 2025 (2)

Evidence

Puttaert 2025

Puttaert, N., Dachet, D., Baye, A., Quertemont, E., Leduc, L., Nyssen, A.-S., & Verpoorten, D. (2025). Effects of SI-PASS on a high-risk course – A randomized controlled trial. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102042

q3 · i? · causal · r2

RCT comparison of the number of online exercises completed between experimental and control groups using LMS learning analytics. "No statistical difference was found in engagement with the online exercises" between the two randomly assigned groups.

"No statistical difference was found in engagement with the online exercises (number of online exercises completed, irrespective of the accuracy of the answers) between the groups (t(182) = .48, p = .63)."

Puttaert 2025 (2)

Puttaert, N., Dachet, D., Baye, A., Quertemont, E., Leduc, L., Nyssen, A.-S., & Verpoorten, D. (2025). Effects of SI-PASS on a high-risk course – A randomized controlled trial. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102042

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Correlation matrix computed for SI-PASS participants only, relating meeting attendance to online exercise interaction. The correlation was significant at "r(90) = .33, p = .001", a printed effect size of r = .33, suggesting students engaged with one support tend to engage with the other.

"Yet, a correlation matrix calculated for SI-PASS students only reveal a significant relationship between their attendance at meetings and their interaction with online exercises (r(90) = .33, p = .001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id si-pass-engagement-ecology-patterns
title SI-PASS participants did not engage more with online exercises than controls in the RCT, but attendance correlated with online exercise engagement
description SI-PASS participants did not engage more with online exercises than controls in the RCT, but attendance correlated with online exercise engagement
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — puttaert-2025, puttaert-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.