Sidak post hoc tests showed blended learning and e-learning each significantly outperformed traditional teaching, but did not differ significantly from each other¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Blended learning and e-learning did not differ significantly from each other (p > 0.05), while each differed significantly from traditional teaching (p < 0.05). → Gambari 2017

Evidence¶

Gambari 2017¶

Gambari, A. I., Shittu, A. T., Ogunlade, O. O., & Osunlade, O. R. (2017). Effectiveness Of Blended Learning And E-Learning Modes Of Instruction On The Performance Of Undergraduates In Kwara State, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1125071

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Sidak post hoc analysis of mean performance scores in the same 85-student quasi-experiment; Table 4 prints mean differences of 1.1333 (blended vs e-learning, p = 0.129) and 4.0533 (blended vs traditional, p = 0.000*); "there was no significant difference between students taught using Blended Learning and E-Learning".

"Table 4 revealed that, there was no significant difference between students taught using Blended Learning and E-Learning (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was significant difference between Undergraduates’ taught using Blended Learning and Conventional Teaching Method (P < 0.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Undergraduates taught with blended learning significantly outperformed those taught with traditional teaching in an educational technology course — related
• Both the Traditional and Reversed algorithm groups significantly outperform a single-tone Control group in soundscape recognition accuracy, without differing from each other — related