Claims

Students rate simulation as improving critical thinking, problem solving, reporting and recording, and decision making, with communication and nursing process rated lower

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? More than 80% of students agreed simulation improved their critical thinking, problem solving, reporting and recording, and decision making skills (81.2%, 82.8%, 81.2%, and 82.8% respectively). → ALFozan et al. 2015

Evidence

ALFozan et al. 2015

Haya ALFozan, Yousria El Sayed, Farida Habib. (2015). Designing, Implementing and Evaluating Preclinical Simulation Lab for Maternity Nursing Course. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.12. https://www.iiste.org/journals/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Outcome Likert-scale questionnaire (Table 2, n = 64) covering nine skill outcomes. These are self-reported perceptions, not tested performance measures; less than three quarters agreed simulation improved nursing process and communication skills.

"Table 2 showed that more than 80% of the students a greed that simulation improved their critical think ing skills. problem solving skills, reporting and recording ski lls, and decision making skills ( 81.2%, 82.8%, 81. 2%, and 82.8% respectively)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.