Students rate simulation as improving critical thinking, problem solving, reporting and recording, and decision making, with communication and nursing process rated lower¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? More than 80% of students agreed simulation improved their critical thinking, problem solving, reporting and recording, and decision making skills (81.2%, 82.8%, 81.2%, and 82.8% respectively). → ALFozan et al. 2015
Evidence¶
ALFozan et al. 2015¶
Haya ALFozan, Yousria El Sayed, Farida Habib. (2015). Designing, Implementing and Evaluating Preclinical Simulation Lab for Maternity Nursing Course. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.12. https://www.iiste.org/journals/
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Outcome Likert-scale questionnaire (Table 2, n = 64) covering nine skill outcomes. These are self-reported perceptions, not tested performance measures; less than three quarters agreed simulation improved nursing process and communication skills.
"Table 2 showed that more than 80% of the students a greed that simulation improved their critical think ing skills. problem solving skills, reporting and recording ski lls, and decision making skills ( 81.2%, 82.8%, 81. 2%, and 82.8% respectively)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
- Problem Solving — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Nursing students express positive perception of preclinical maternity simulation sessions, with objectives and information rated highest and fidelity/realism rated lowest — related
- Very high majorities of students rated high-fidelity simulation as enhancing learning, clinical reasoning, decision-making, and value — related
- Simulation type–outcome alignment: high-fidelity formats favour judgment and decision-making, VR and games favour empathy and reflection — related
- No included study measured critical thinking as an explicit outcome or compared simulation modalities directly — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.