Claims

Simulation-based interventions produce a small but statistically significant improvement in nursing students' empathy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A meta-analysis of 28 studies found simulation interventions produced a small but statistically significant improvement in empathy among nursing students, with stronger effects in quasi-experimental designs and larger samples. → Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi 2025

Evidence

Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi 2025

Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi. (2025). The impact of clinical simulation on bridging the theory–practice gap in nursing education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07790-8

q3 · i? · review · r2

Meta-analysis (Cho et al., cited by this review) of "28 studies" found "a small but statistically significant improvement in empathy"; the review reports this second-hand, so quality is capped accordingly.

"A recent meta-analysis involving 28 studies demonstrated that such interventions produced a small but statistically significant improvement in empathy among nursing students, with stronger effects observed in studies using quasi-experimental designs and larger sample sizes"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.