Claims

Most errors sixth graders made on mixed-type word problems were non-computational, involving problem understanding and equation setup

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? When 26 sixth graders solved four mixed-type word problems, half the errors were not computational but involved understanding the problem and setting up the correct equations. → Lenat 2014

Evidence

Lenat 2014

Lenat, D. B., & Durlach, P. J. (2014). Reinforcing Math Knowledge by Immersing Students in a Simulated Learning-By-Teaching Experience. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0016-x

q2 · i? · design · r1

Initial cognitive-task-analysis session: 26 sixth graders completed four math word problems individually on the whiteboard. The teacher expected no difficulty, but most students made many errors and took significantly longer than expected.

"Half the errors were not computational, but rather involved understanding the problem and solving the correct equations."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.