Feasibility studies showed larger narrative gains for SKILL classrooms and high-risk children, with a large effect in a small-scale RCT¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2–r3·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 In a two-classroom quasi-experiment, pre–post effect sizes on a narrative language sample were three times larger for the SKILL classroom (d = .82) than the BAU classroom (d = .21), with differential effects favoring high-risk children. → Gillam 2022
q2 i3 In a small RCT of 20 children with DLD, SKILL yielded a large effect on the Test of Narrative Language (d = 1.45). → Gillam 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Gillam 2022¶
Gillam, S. L., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Capin, P., Fall, A.-M., Israelsen-Augenstein, M., Holbrook, S., Wada, R., Hancock, A., Fox, C., Dille, J., Magimairaj, B. M., & Gillam, R. B. (2022). Improving Oral and Written Narration and Reading Comprehension of Children at-Risk for Language and Literacy Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000766
q2 · i3 · causal · r3
Quasi-experimental feasibility study with two 1st grade classrooms, 30 minutes of whole-class SKILL three times per week for six weeks. The narrative language sample effect was "three times larger" in the SKILL classroom, "d = .82" versus d = .21.
"The pre –post effect sizes on a narrative lan- guage sample were three times larger for children in the experi- mental classroom ( d = .82) than children in the BAU class ( d = .21)."
Gillam 2022 (2)¶
Gillam, S. L., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Capin, P., Fall, A.-M., Israelsen-Augenstein, M., Holbrook, S., Wada, R., Hancock, A., Fox, C., Dille, J., Magimairaj, B. M., & Gillam, R. B. (2022). Improving Oral and Written Narration and Reading Comprehension of Children at-Risk for Language and Literacy Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000766
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
Small-scale RCT with 20 elementary-age children with developmental language disorders, ten per condition, in groups of three for 35–40 minutes three times weekly for 6 weeks. SKILL produced "a large Cohen ’s d effect size of 1.45" on the TNL at posttest.
"The SKILL instruction resulted in statistically signi ficant gains on a standardized measure of narrative pro ficiency (Test of Narrative Language, TNL; Gillam & Pearson, 2004 ), yielding a large Cohen ’s d effect size of 1.45 for group differences at posttest."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Oral Language — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Year 1 of the ROOTS efficacy trial used a classroom-blocked RCT assigning at-risk kindergartners to ROOTS-large, ROOTS-small, or no-treatment control conditions — related
- Oral narration gains generalize to written narration at posttest and are maintained at follow-up — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.