Claims

Participants' willingness to skip feedback after correct responses increases substantially across retrieval-practice cycles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Skipping after correct responses rose from below half on Cycle 1 (M = .49) to reliably more on Cycles 2 and 3, reaching a level matching their incorrect-assessment rate by Cycle 4. → Matthew Jensen Hays 2010

Evidence

Matthew Jensen Hays 2010

Matthew Jensen Hays, Nate Kornell, and Robert A. Bjork. (2010). The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.797

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Cross-cycle analysis of skipping behavior in the skipping-permitted condition; the increase from Cycle 3 to Cycle 4 (M = .85) was only marginal [t(32) = 1.85, p = .074].

"They skipped feedback after fewer than half of their correct responses on Cycle 1 (M 5 .49, SD 5 .36). They were reliably more likely to skip feedback after a correct response on Cycle 2 (M 5 .57, SD 5 .35)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id skipping-after-correct-increases-across-cycles
title Participants' willingness to skip feedback after correct responses increases substantially across retrieval-practice cycles
description Participants' willingness to skip feedback after correct responses increases substantially across retrieval-practice cycles
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — matthew-jensen-hays-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.