Sleep cueing with name+positive trait pairs improves explicit attitudes: likeability, social willingness, and trust choices favor the cued person¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Post-sleep likeability (d = 0.41) and social willingness to engage (d = 0.50) were higher for the cued than uncued name. → Zhao 2025
q3 i? In an ultimatum game, 77.8% chose the cued person as allocator versus 22.2% for the uncued person (χ²(1) = 16.67, p < 0.001); no standardized effect size was printed. → Zhao 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Zhao 2025¶
Zhao, H., Lin, X., Yuan, K., Hu, X., Wang, X., Su, W., Wang, Q., & Lu, L. (2025). Updating social evaluation during sleep. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00356-9
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Explicit preference rating test after sleep on a 1–7 scale. Likeability was higher for the cued name (4.21 ± 1.01 vs 3.61 ± 1.10, d = 0.41); social willingness was also higher (4.25 ± 1.18 vs 3.43 ± 1.19, d = 0.50), both significant paired t-tests.
"participants showed a significantly greater degree of likeability and social willingness to engage with the individuals with cued names than those with uncued names (degree of likeability: mean ± SD; cued name: 4.21 ± 1.01; uncued name: 3.61 ± 1.10;t(75) = 3.55,p < 0.001, Cohen’sd=0 . 4 1"
Zhao 2025 (2)¶
Zhao, H., Lin, X., Yuan, K., Hu, X., Wang, X., Su, W., Wang, Q., & Lu, L. (2025). Updating social evaluation during sleep. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00356-9
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Single-trial ultimatum game with a hypothetical 500 yuan reward, measuring social trust by allocator choice. "The choice of selecting the individuals with the cued name (77.8%) was significantly greater than that with an uncued name (22.2%)" (Χ²(1) = 16.67, p < 0.001). The article prints no standardized effect size for this contrast.
"the choice of selecting the individuals with the cued name (77.8%) was significantly greater than that with an uncued name (22.2%),Χ2(1) = 16.67,p < 0.001"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mere acoustic name exposure during sleep without positive traits does not enhance mental facial representations of the named person — related
- Sleep cueing with name+positive trait pairs biases trait memory toward more positive and less negative memories of the cued person — related
- Sleep cueing with name+positive trait pairs improves implicit attitudes (IAT D-scores) toward the cued person — related
- Acoustic name+positive trait pair cueing during slow-wave sleep increases the perceived attractiveness of the cued person's mental facial representation — related
- The number of slow oscillations during sleep is positively correlated with attractiveness ratings of faces associated with cued names but not uncued names — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sleep-cueing-improves-explicit-attitudes-trust |
title |
Sleep cueing with name+positive trait pairs improves explicit attitudes: likeability, social willingness, and trust choices favor the cued person |
description |
Sleep cueing with name+positive trait pairs improves explicit attitudes: likeability, social willingness, and trust choices favor the cued person |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — zhao-2025, zhao-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.