Claims

Children evaluated their own performance as worse when they were slower in Grades 3 and 4

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In Grades 3 and 4, children evaluated their own performance as worse when they were slower. → Desoete 2019

Evidence

Desoete 2019

Desoete, A., Baten, E., Vercaemst, V., De Busschere, A., Baudonck, M., & Vanhaeke, J. (2019). Metacognition and motivation as predictors for mathematics performance of Belgian elementary school children. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01020-w

q3 · i? · associational · r?

Observation from the longitudinal study of Belgian elementary children. The abstract reports that children "evaluated their own performance as worse when they were slower" in Grades 3 and 4; no effect size is printed.

"In addition, we observed that children evaluated their own performance as worse when they were slower in Grades 3 and 4."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id slower-children-rate-own-performance-worse-grades-3-4
title Children evaluated their own performance as worse when they were slower in Grades 3 and 4
description Children evaluated their own performance as worse when they were slower in Grades 3 and 4
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — desoete-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.