Claims

Smartphone use during class is a distraction with potential to compromise grades (review attribution)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review reports, citing Synnott (2015), that students' use of smartphones during class time is a distraction and has the potential to compromise grades. → Walls 2016

Evidence

Walls 2016

Walls, J. K. (2016). A Theoretically Grounded Framework for Integrating the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i2.19217

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

Narrative review attribution in the Context (microsystem) section: the article states smartphone use "during class time is a distraction and has the potential to compromise grades". The claim is hedged as potential, and no effect size is printed.

"On campus, students' use of smartphones during class time is a distraction and has the potential to compromise grades (Synnott, 2015)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id smartphone-class-distraction-grades
title Smartphone use during class is a distraction with potential to compromise grades (review attribution)
description Smartphone use during class is a distraction with potential to compromise grades (review attribution)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — walls-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.