Claims

Interviewed students perceived SMS learning support as having more advantages than disadvantages

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? All ten interviewed students believed SMS as a learning support tool had more advantages than disadvantages, citing familiarity, convenience, improved retention and understanding, and indirect motivational effects. → Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah 2013

Evidence

Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah 2013

Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah. (2013). The Impact of Using SMS as Learning Support Tool on Students' Learning. International Education Studies, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n10p112

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Semi-structured interviews with ten randomly selected SMS-group students (5 female, 5 male), each lasting 20 to 30 minutes; responses were coded qualitatively. Students valued SMS as "familiar, easy to use, immediate, convenient, ubiquitous, and quiet" and reported better retention of key concepts.

"All the interviewed students believed that the use of SMS technology as learning support tool has more advantages than disadvantages."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.