In the model, social learning creates consensus in trust without shifting aggregate reliance; connectivity alone does not produce collective overreliance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoreticalr3·q1–q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the 2×2 topology×tagging design with feedback off, all four cells give overreliance 0.30–0.31; with feedback on, all rise together to ≈0.51. → Ahana Biswas 2026
q2 i? Social learning compresses trust dispersion while leaving the aggregate unchanged, consistent with the mean-preservation theorem. → Ahana Biswas 2026
q1 i? Analytically, under a DeGroot update with doubly-stochastic influence weights the population mean of trust is invariant and cross-sectional variance is non-increasing. → Ahana Biswas 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Ahana Biswas 2026¶
Ahana Biswas. (2026). Modeling AI Overreliance as a Complex Adaptive System. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19616 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.19616
q2 · i? · theoretical · r3
Simulation crossing network topology (ER vs BA) with source tagging on/off, with and without the social-proof channel (Fig. 3a), the empirical counterpart of Proposition 2. The article reports "all four cells give overreliance 0.30–0.31 (within CI)" without feedback, and that social learning "sharply compresses trust dispersion (consensus)".
"with feedback off, all four cells give overreliance 0.30–0.31 (within CI); with feedback on, all rise together to≈0.51. Social learning sharply compresses trust dispersion (consensus) while leaving the aggregate unchanged."
Ahana Biswas 2026 (2)¶
Ahana Biswas. (2026). Modeling AI Overreliance as a Complex Adaptive System. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19616
q1 · i? · theoretical · r3
Analytical result (Proposition 2, proof in supplement): under the DeGroot trust update with doubly-stochastic weights, "the population mean¯τis invariant" and variance is non-increasing; the Dirichlet variant used in the main model is verified computationally.
"Under the DeGroot stepτ ′ = (1−λ)τ+λWτ with doubly-stochasticW, the population mean¯τis invariant and the cross-sectional variance is non-increasing."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In the model, topology shifts aggregate reliance only under opinion dynamics, when influential hubs transmit correlated beliefs that move agents across the verify/use margin — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- In the model, interventions that alter the feedback channel (verification visibility, social-proof damping) reduce overreliance and regret, while lowering verification cost alone does not lower regret — related
- In the model, visible unverified peer use (social proof) suppresses verification and tips the population into collective overreliance, via a smooth crossover with no hysteresis — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
social-learning-consensus-not-aggregate-overreliance |
title |
In the model, social learning creates consensus in trust without shifting aggregate reliance; connectivity alone does not produce collective overreliance |
description |
In the model, social learning creates consensus in trust without shifting aggregate reliance; connectivity alone does not produce collective overreliance |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ahana-biswas-2026, ahana-biswas-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.