Claims

Sound Partners shows no discernible effects on general reading achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The WWC rated Sound Partners as having no discernible effects on general reading achievement, based on a single study with an improvement index of +9 percentile points. → Sound Partners 2010

Evidence

Sound Partners 2010

Sound Partners. (2010). WWC Intervention Report: Sound Partners. What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. http://www.wri-edu.org/partners/sound-partners.htm

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The WWC synthesis reports that "the improvement index for the one study examining general reading (Mooney, 2003) is +9 percentile points"; the reported positive effect was not statistically significant in WWC calculations.

"The improvement index for the one study examining general reading (Mooney, 2003) is +9 percentile points."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sound-partners-no-discernible-general-reading
title Sound Partners shows no discernible effects on general reading achievement
description Sound Partners shows no discernible effects on general reading achievement
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sound-partners-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.