No intervention benefits on source references in students' written conclusions (far transfer question)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? In the far transfer question, only a small minority of students referred to source, and no intervention benefits were found. → Ana Pérez 2018

Evidence¶

Ana Pérez 2018¶

Ana Pérez, Anna Potocki, Marc Stadtler, Mônica Macedo-Rouet, Johanna Paul, Ladislao Salmerón, Jean-François Rouet. (2018). Fostering Teenagers' Assessment of Information Reliability: Effects of a Classroom Intervention focused on Critical Source Dimensions. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive proportions in the far transfer question of the 137-student intervention: "only a small minority referred to source (0.06 control and 0.07 trained)". Statistical analyses were not conducted on this question due to the low frequency of source reference.

"in the far transfer question ("What can be concluded") only a small minority referred to source (0.06 control and 0.07 trained)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Retrieval practice enhances performance on final inference and transfer questions relative to restudying, although a single-word fill-in-the-blank task did not — related
• The benefits of retrieval practice do not depend on an exact match between initial retrieval practice conditions and the final test format — related
• Advance organizers facilitate conceptual retention and far transfer of unfamiliar technical material for learners lacking relevant prior knowledge — related
• Whether prompting students to construct explanations during retrieval adds benefit beyond initial free recall is mixed across studies — related