Claims

Studies of simulated patient-based CST report positive effects on trainee confidence and communication performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Empirical studies of SP-based CST across student and practising HCP settings report increased confidence, improved communication performance judged by SPs, and improved standardised assessment performance. → Pilnick Alison 2018

Evidence

Pilnick Alison 2018

Pilnick Alison, Trusson Diane, Beeke Suzanne, O'Brien Rebecca, Goldberg Sarah, Harwood Rowan H. (2018). Using conversation analysis to inform role play and simulated interaction in communications skills training for healthcare professionals: identifying avenues for further development through a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1381-1

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's synthesis of empirical SP studies across settings (anaesthesia, obstetrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, speech and language) reports positive effects including "increased confidence of the students or HCPs". No effect sizes are printed.

"These include: increased confidence of the students or HCPs [34, 36]; improved communication performance as judged by the simulated patients [33, 37]; and improved performance in standardised assessments [7]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.