The spacing-induced practice decrement is confined to the first two quiz questions, with no significant difference on the third¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 A significant timing × order interaction, F(2, 358) = 26.92, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.131, superseded the main effect of question order. → Keith B. Lyle 2022
q3 i2 Massing was significantly better on the first question (Hedges' gav = 0.42) and second question (gav = 0.24), but conditions did not differ significantly on the third question. → Keith B. Lyle 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Keith B. Lyle 2022¶
Keith B. Lyle, Campbell R. Bego, Patricia A. S. Ralston, Jason C. Immekus. (2022). Spaced Retrieval Practice Imposes Desirable Difficulty in Calculus Learning. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09677-2
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
The same within-participants ANOVA on quiz scores (N = 180) revealed a "significant interaction between order and timing" with ηp² = 0.131, superseding the order main effect (ηp² = 0.158).
"Ther e was also a main effect of order, F(2, 358) = 33.67, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.158, but t his was superseded by a significant interaction between order and timing, F(2, 358) = 26.92, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.131."
Keith B. Lyle 2022 (2)¶
Keith B. Lyle, Campbell R. Bego, Patricia A. S. Ralston, Jason C. Immekus. (2022). Spaced Retrieval Practice Imposes Desirable Difficulty in Calculus Learning. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09677-2
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Bonferroni-corrected paired t tests on each question position (N = 180) showed massed performance "significantly better performance on the first question" (gav = 0.42) and second (gav = 0.24), with no significant difference on the third.
"Massing was associated with significantly better performance on the first question, t(179) = 5.81, p < 0.001, Hedges' gav = 0.42, and second question, t(179) = 3.04, p = 0.003, Hedges' gav = 0.24. The conditions did not differ significantly on the third question, t(179) = 1.33, p = 0.185."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Spaced quizzing reduces overall performance on calculus practice quizzes relative to massed quizzing — related
- Spaced quizzing increases end-of-semester retention of calculus learning objectives relative to massed quizzing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
spacing-decrement-limited-to-first-two-questions |
title |
The spacing-induced practice decrement is confined to the first two quiz questions, with no significant difference on the third |
description |
The spacing-induced practice decrement is confined to the first two quiz questions, with no significant difference on the third |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-21 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — keith-b-lyle-2022, keith-b-lyle-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.