Spaced practice produces a robust small-to-medium retention advantage over massed practice for mathematics learning overall (g = 0.26).¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 Across 25 studies with 49 effect sizes, spaced versus massed mathematics practice yields a weighted mean effect of g = 0.259 with a confidence interval excluding zero. → Murray 2023
Evidence¶
Murray 2023¶
Murray, E., Horner, A. J., & Göbel, S. M. (2023). A Meta-analytic Review of the Effectiveness of Spacing and Retrieval Practice for Mathematics Learning. https://osf.io/
q3 · i1 · quant-synthesis · r3
Pre-registered meta-analysis using robust variance estimation with correlated hierarchical effects over 25 spacing studies. The weighted mean effect was "g = 0.259 (se = 0.043)" with a 95% CI of [0.168, 0.351], indicating a robust small-to-medium effect.
"The systematic review revealed 25 studies with 49 effect sizes. We found a weighted mean effect of g = 0.259 (se = 0.043) (95% confidence interval [0.168, 0.351])."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- When spacing is embedded into a course, spaced practice retains a robust but numerically smaller effect (g = 0.24) than for isolated material. — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Total retrieval spacing improved one-week vocabulary recall while relative schedules were not distinguished — related
- Spaced Practice Improves Retention — related
- For isolated mathematics material, spaced practice shows a larger but less precise effect (g = 0.38) than the overall spacing effect. — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Spaced retrieval practice produces better final retention than massed retrieval even though spacing lowers initial retrieval success, and more absolute spacing enhances long-term retention — related
- Spaced Retrieval Improves Retention — related
- Spaced retrieval practice outperformed both massed retrieval practice and no-practice control on delayed financial knowledge, while massed and control did not differ — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
spacing-effect-mathematics-overall-meta-analysis |
title |
Spaced practice produces a robust small-to-medium retention advantage over massed practice for mathematics learning overall (g = 0.26). |
description |
Spaced practice produces a robust small-to-medium retention advantage over massed practice for mathematics learning overall (g = 0.26). |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — murray-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.