Claims

Speaking proficiency and speaking anxiety were significantly negatively correlated at posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Posttest speaking proficiency and posttest speaking anxiety correlated negatively and significantly (r = -0.704, significant at the 0.01 level). → El-Sakka 2016

Evidence

El-Sakka 2016

El-Sakka, S. M. F. (2016). Self-Regulated Strategy Instruction for Developing Speaking Proficiency and Reducing Speaking Anxiety of Egyptian University Students. English Language Teaching, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n12p22

q2 · i3 · causal · r1

Pearson correlation computed on the same forty participants' posttest scores. The article reports r = -0.704, significant at the 0.01 level, and concludes improvement in speaking proficiency led to reduction in speaking anxiety.

"The correlation coefficient for the speaking proficiency posttest and speaking anxiety posttest was - 0.704. This coefficient is significant at the 0.01 level."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.