Central Wikipedia articles are primarily edited by domain specialists while boundary-spanning articles are authored by generalists¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the reported follow-up analysis, high-centrality articles were primarily edited by specialists active in only one domain, whereas high-betweenness boundary-spanning articles were primarily authored by generalists contributing to both domains. → Peter Holtz & Joachim Kimmerle & Ulrike Cress 2018
Evidence¶
Peter Holtz & Joachim Kimmerle & Ulrike Cress 2018¶
Peter Holtz & Joachim Kimmerle & Ulrike Cress. (2018). Using big data techniques for measuring productive friction in mass collaboration online environments. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9285-y
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports this from further SNA analysis (Halatchliyski et al. 2014) of contributors' previous edits in the psychology and education domains; both article types were authored by more experienced users. No effect size is printed.
"In comparison, articles with high betweenness scores, which spanned the two domains, were primarily authored by generalists who regularly contributed to both domains."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- New Wikipedia knowledge emerges around pivotal articles: high-centrality articles within domains and high-betweenness boundary-spanning articles between domains — related
- Artifacts and their interconnected structure operationalize collective knowledge processes in large-scale Wikipedia analysis — a broader claim this one bears on
- Three big data methods—text classification, cluster analysis, and social network analysis—can each yield insights into learning in mass collaboration — a broader claim this one bears on
- Boundary spanning perceptions and actions are critical mechanisms for productive divergent collaboration
- Wikipedia contributors show confirmation bias by preferentially editing articles consistent with their own views — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
specialists-edit-central-generalists-span-boundaries |
title |
Central Wikipedia articles are primarily edited by domain specialists while boundary-spanning articles are authored by generalists |
description |
Central Wikipedia articles are primarily edited by domain specialists while boundary-spanning articles are authored by generalists |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — peter-holtz-joachim-kimmerle-ulrike-cress-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.