Association strength between self-regulation and developmental outcomes varies by measurement type (review-attributed)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Across 150 studies, direct assessments showed the strongest associations with developmental outcomes, followed by teacher reports, then parent reports. → Jiang 2025

Evidence¶

Jiang 2025¶

Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y., Brown Campbell, K.-A., Zhong, T., Zehner, T., James, V., Devlin, B., Geer, E., Shire, S., & Schmitt, S. (2025). Untangling Conceptual Clutter: A Systematic Review of Adult-Reported Self-Regulation Measurement in Children Aged 0–8 Years. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10066-8

q2 · i? · review · r3

The current review reports, citing Robson et al. (2020), a meta-analytic review of 150 studies identifying 67 measurement tools, that "direct assessments showing the strongest associations, followed by teacher reports, and then parent reports." The reviewed study's design is not independently verified here.

"The review found that the strength of associations between self-regulation and developmental outcomes varied by measurement type, with direct assessments showing the strongest associations, followed by teacher reports, and then parent reports."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Some measures' evaluated self-regulation categories misalign with their intended theoretical orientation