SRL writing-stage clusters differed in production and revision but not in pausing¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among four clusters of students differing in what they wrote about planning, performance, and reflection, the anti-planner cluster produced more than the performer cluster and the planner cluster revised more than the anti-planner cluster, with no differences in pausing. → Joep van der Graaf 2023
Evidence¶
Joep van der Graaf 2023¶
Joep van der Graaf, Michelle Taub, Yizhou Fan. (2023). Introduction to special issue on facilitating self-regulated learning with scaffolds: Recent advances and future directions. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09364-9
q2 · i? · review · r2
The introduction reports, citing Taub et al. (this issue), a self-reflective writing task with university writing-class students in which four clusters were identified by SRL stage content, informing a discussion of advantages and disadvantages of event-based versus time-based scaffolds. "No differences were found in pausing." No effect sizes are printed.
"The anti-planner cluster produced more than the performer cluster, and the planner cluster revised more than the anti-planner cluster. No differences were found in pausing."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cluster analysis identifies two antagonistic student profiles differing in level of technology-supported self-regulated learning — related
- Exploratory K-means clustering identifies four heterogeneous student AI-user profiles differing in experience, competence, usefulness, trust, and control, but the solution's optimality and stability are not established — related
- Skilled EFL writers apply procedural planning strategies of brainstorming, organizing, and outlining before writing, and revising strategies of pause-to-think, reviewing, and local plus global revision. — related
- Keystroke patterns during web-based DP exams suggested planning, revision, and sustained cognitive engagement — related
- In one keystroke-logging study, spontaneous sentence production under minimal planning is associated with gains in writers' self-rated understanding and with lower initial text quality — related
- Planner and reviser questionnaire scores show frequency main effects on several online activities, with no interaction with episode — related
- Two distinct group deliberation patterns emerge in response to regulation triggers: the Plan and Implementation Approach (PIA) and the Trials and Failure Approach (TFA) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
srl-writing-clusters-production-revision |
title |
SRL writing-stage clusters differed in production and revision but not in pausing |
description |
SRL writing-stage clusters differed in production and revision but not in pausing |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — joep-van-der-graaf-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.