Claims

SRSD intervention effects on elements and words decrease from posttest to maintenance but remain statistically significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Effect sizes declined from posttest to maintenance (elements d = 0.90 to 0.77; words d = 0.47 to 0.38) while remaining significant. → Mason et al. 2017

Evidence

Mason et al. 2017

Linda H. Mason, Anne Mong Cramer, Justin D. Garwood, Cheryl Varghese, Jill Hamm, and Allen Murray. (2017). Efficacy of Self-Regulated Strategy Development Instruction for Developing Writers With and Without Disabilities in Rural Schools: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 36(4), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517723617

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

The authors' comparison of posttest and maintenance effect sizes in the rural RCT reports that "the effectiveness of the intervention decreased over time once instruction was completed" yet significant differences maintained (ES = 0.77 elements; ES = 0.38 words).

"the effectiveness of the intervention decreased over time once instruction was completed; however, significant differences maintained (ES = 0.77 for number of elements; ES = 0.38 for number of words)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.