Claims

Participants in the Essential Searching Skills course showed increased pre-test to post-test confidence and knowledge on skills covered in the course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Identical five-question pre-tests and post-tests showed increased confidence in building a comprehensive literature search and increased percent-correct on knowledge items covering SRSS skills. → Farris David P. 2024

Evidence

Farris David P. 2024

Farris David P., Lebo Rachael A., Price Carrie. (2024). Designing a framework for curriculum building in systematic review competencies for librarians: a case report. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1930

q2 · i? · design · r3

Pre-test/post-test analysis (Table 2) across course cohorts using an identical five-question test covering confidence and course knowledge items. Mean confidence rose from 3.32 to 3.96 (+0.64) and percent correct rose on each knowledge item, e.g. PRISMA-S categories from 62 to 78 (+16). No statistical test or effect size is reported.

"The participant pre-test/post-test scores demonstrate an increase in knowledge for skills important to systematic review searching which are outlined in the list of SRSS skills (Table 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.