Under SSCS+MS, low academic students' creative thinking improvement exceeded high academic students' (descriptive corrected means)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Corrected creative thinking improvement was 239.38% for SSCS+MS low academic students versus 152.77% for high academic students. → Yusnaeni 2017
Evidence¶
Yusnaeni 2017¶
Yusnaeni, Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H. & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative Thinking of Low Academic Student Undergoing Search Solve Create and Share Learning Integrated with Metacognitive Strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 245-262. http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2017_2_16.pdf
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive comparison of corrected mean improvements in Table 4 (SSCS+MS low academic 239.38%, high academic 152.77%) with LSD notations d and e; these are untested descriptive percentages, not effect sizes.
"While related to the SSCS + MS learning model it is seen that the creative thinking ability of the high and low academic ability students is different (d and e); the improvement of the creative thinking ability of the low academic ability students is 36.18% higher than that of the high academic ability students."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Creativity — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- SSCS alone also reversed the ability gap: low academic students improved 17.66% more than high academic students — related
- SSCS+MS learning improves low academic students' creative thinking ability 36.18% more than high academic students — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Learning model and academic ability each significantly affect creative thinking, but their interaction does not — related
- Under traditional learning, high academic students' creative thinking improvement exceeded low academic students' — reports the opposite
- Low-proficiency learners showed the largest creative thinking gains under virtual learning instruction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.