Claims

SSS participation increased growth in classroom engagement relative to control schools

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Treatment schools showed a significantly higher slope of change in teacher-rated engagement than control schools (difference in slope .004, t = 2.73, p < .008). → Webb 2014

Evidence

Webb 2014

Webb, L., Villares, E., Carey, J., Wells, C., & Sayer, A. (2014). Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Student Success Skills. SREE Fall 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562995

q3 · i? · causal · r2

HLM analysis of teacher ratings collected at three time points in the cluster-randomized SSS trial. The summary table reports an Engagement slope difference of ".004 .001 2.73 <.008"; the best-fitting model was a trimmed treatment model.

"Engagement Student Participation Questionnaire .004 .001 2.73 <.008"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.