STAC intervention students showed a trend toward decreased anxiety relative to wait-list control students (p = .06)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The Time x Group interaction for anxiety approached significance, with intervention students decreasing and control students increasing in anxiety from baseline to 30-day follow-up. → Midgett 2016
Evidence¶
Midgett 2016¶
Midgett, A., Doumas, D., Trull, R., & Johnston, A. (2016). A Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating a Brief, Bystander Bullying Intervention with Junior High School Students. Boise State University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1146195
q3 · i? · causal · r2
GLM repeated measures ANOVA using the BASC-3 SRP-A Anxiety scale (sample α = .91) in the randomized controlled study. As seen in Table 1, "students in the intervention group reported a decrease in anxiety, whereas students in the control group reported an increase in anxiety."
"results of the GLM repeated measures ANOVA indicated a trend toward significance for the interaction effect Time x Group for anxiety, Wilks' Lambda = .39, F(1, 51) = 3.62, p = .06, η 2 p = .07. Examination of the η 2 p indicates the effect size approached the medium range."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Academic Anxiety — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- STAC-trained junior high students reported a significantly greater ability to identify bullying at 30-day follow-up than wait-list control students — related
- Junior high students in both the STAC intervention and wait-list control groups increased knowledge and confidence to intervene in bullying, with no significant group difference, suggesting carry-over effects — related
- No significant difference between STAC intervention and control groups in depression from baseline to 30-day follow-up — related
- No significant differences between STAC intervention and control groups in frequency of using the STAC strategies at 30-day follow-up — related
- Teacher enjoyment and anxiety show no significant condition differences — related
- Students with disabilities in SS-SSTP schools report greater willingness to intervene in bullying situations than control students after 2 years — related
- In Study 1 the control group showed a marginally significant increase in anxiety while the treatment group did not change — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.