Claims

STAD cooperative learning alone and traditional teaching have approximately equal effects on undergraduate achievement in electrochemical cells

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The corrected post-test scores of the STAD-only group (CLG) and the traditionally taught control group (CG) did not differ significantly. → Ataman Karaçöp 2016

Evidence

Ataman Karaçöp 2016

Ataman Karaçöp. (2016). Effects of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions Cooperative Learning with Models on Students' Understanding of Electrochemical Cells. International Education Studies, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n11p104

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Bonferroni multiple comparison follow-up to the ANCOVA on post-EcAT scores of the 70-student quasi-experiment found no significant difference between CLG and CG (mean difference 5.955, p > .05); equivalence was not tested.

"Whereas, it was seen that there was not a difference between post EcAT corrected scores of the other two study groups (mean difference between CLG and CG is 5.955; p > .05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.