Claims

The STAD group showed a larger descriptive gain in problem solving ability than the PBL group.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The STAD group's problem solving scores rose from 21.240 to 33.960 while the PBL group's rose from 20.400 to 24.360, a difference the authors describe as huge. → Tawachai Rattanatumma and Dr.Vichian Puncreobutr 2016

Evidence

Tawachai Rattanatumma and Dr.Vichian Puncreobutr 2016

Tawachai Rattanatumma and Dr.Vichian Puncreobutr. (2016). Assessing the Effectiveness of STAD Model and Problem Based Learning in Mathematics Learning Achievement and Problem Solving Ability. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.12. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099565

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive statistics from Table 2 show the STAD group's problem solving mean rose from 21.240 to 33.960 while the PBL group's rose from 20.400 to 24.360. The authors describe this as a huge difference in scores between the two teaching methods.

"A huge difference in scores w as observed between two teaching methods and hence it can be concluded that STAD model of cooperative learning have high impact in improving problem solving ability of students."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.