In a self-selected survey, students favored delayed disclosure and agency, but 39.3% found the system too indirect and 42.9% reported repetition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among 28 survey respondents, 18 (64.3%) agreed they could make their own design decisions and 21 (75.0%) disagreed that the system revealed too much information too early. → Sara Riazi and Pedram Rooshenas 2026
q2 i? Eleven of 28 respondents (39.3%) found the system too indirect when they needed a more explicit answer, and 12 of 28 (42.9%) reported repeated questions or explanations. → Sara Riazi and Pedram Rooshenas 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Sara Riazi and Pedram Rooshenas 2026¶
Sara Riazi and Pedram Rooshenas. (2026). An Educator-Guided LLM Pedagogical Agent for Scaffolded Feedback in Conceptual Database Design. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00870 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.00870
q2 · i? · design · r2
Optional, ungraded survey of 63 enrolled students; 31 responded, one excluded, leaving at most 30 system users (47.6% of enrollment). The article reports "18 of 28 respondents (64.3%)" and "21 of 28 (75.0%)" from this self-selected sample.
"Eighteen of 28 respondents (64.3%) agreed that they could make their own design decisions, and 21 of 28 (75.0%) disagreed that the system revealed too much information too early."
Sara Riazi and Pedram Rooshenas 2026 (2)¶
Sara Riazi and Pedram Rooshenas. (2026). An Educator-Guided LLM Pedagogical Agent for Scaffolded Feedback in Conceptual Database Design. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00870
q2 · i? · design · r2
Same self-selected survey; the article reports "39.3% found the system too indirect" and "42.9% reported repeated questions or explanations", with open-ended responses requesting more localized guidance and less repetition.
"Eleven of 28 respondents (39.3%) found the system too indirect when they needed a more explicit answer, and 12 of 28 (42.9%) reported repeated questions or explanations."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Qualitative analysis found staged disclosure sometimes withheld inaccurate diagnostic details, but some errors still shaped student revisions — related
- In the AVP, per-turn disclosure change responds to trainee exploration but not measurably to trainee empathy, and the static baseline shows no significant joint response — related
- Most learners disregarded the system's learning and repetition recommendations, with self-regulated decision-making taking precedence over the suggested path — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
staged-feedback-survey-perceptions |
title |
In a self-selected survey, students favored delayed disclosure and agency, but 39.3% found the system too indirect and 42.9% reported repetition |
description |
In a self-selected survey, students favored delayed disclosure and agency, but 39.3% found the system too indirect and 42.9% reported repetition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — sara-riazi-and-pedram-rooshenas-2026, sara-riazi-and-pedram-rooshenas-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.