Stakeholder groups prioritized different design guidelines: instructors most frequently commented on usability (G4), students on educational support (G13), and researchers on instructional best practices and learning engineering¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across the 19 guidelines, instructors most frequently commented on usability (G4) and students on the amount of educational support provided (G13), while researcher comments concentrated on instructional best practices (G8, G9, G10) and learning engineering (G14); guideline G3 was raised only by researchers. → stakeholder-dist-1
Evidence¶
stakeholder-dist-1¶
Jennifer M. Reddig, Glen R. Smith Jr., Sanaz Ahmadzadeh Siyahrood, Wesley G. Morris, Yoojin Bae, Kaitlyn Crutcher, John Kos, Rahul K. Dass, Jinho Kim, Momin Naushad Siddiqui, Daniel Weitekamp, Ploy Thajchayapong, Sandeep Kakar, Alex Endert, Scott Crossley, Min Kyu Kim, Chris Dede, Ashok Goel, and Christopher J. MacLellan. 2026. Guidelines for Designing AI Technologies to Support Adult Learning. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '26), Singapore, Singapore. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3800645.3813102
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Cross-technology thematic analysis of approximately 1,600 stakeholder statements, visualized by comment counts per guideline in Figure 4, found that "Instructors most frequently commented on the usability of AI tools (G4)" and students on educational support (G13). The article also notes the Learning Theories guideline (G3) was a concern only for researchers.
"Instructors most frequently commented on the usability of AI tools (G4) and students most frequently commented on the amount of educational support provided (G13), but both stakeholders commented heavily on these two dimensions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students co-designing a GenAI course policy prioritized training for students and instructors, standardized disclosure procedures, and stronger institutional support — related
- Stakeholder and faculty buy-in, time constraints, and lack of measurable definitions are the main challenges to integrating and assessing dispositions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
stakeholder-groups-prioritize-different-guidelines |
title |
Stakeholder groups prioritized different design guidelines: instructors most frequently commented on usability (G4), students on educational support (G13), and researchers on instructional best practices and learning engineering |
description |
Stakeholder groups prioritized different design guidelines: instructors most frequently commented on usability (G4), students on educational support (G13), and researchers on instructional best practices and learning... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stakeholder-dist-1 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.