Claims

The article attributes the discrepancy with inspection-time studies to methodology, arguing standardized measures are sensitive enough to detect processing speed deficits in ASD

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors interpret the conflicting literature as methodological: inspection-time tasks may produce ceiling effects, and standardized measures better detect clinically-related deficits. → Haigh Sarah M. 2018

Evidence

Haigh Sarah M. 2018

Haigh Sarah M., Walsh Jennifer A., Mazefsky Carla A., Minshew Nancy J., Eack Shaun M. (2018). Processing Speed is Impaired in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Relates to Social Communication Abilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3515-z

q1 · i? · associational · r2

Authors' interpretation in the Discussion, not a tested result: they attribute the conflict with inspection-time studies (Scheuffgen et al. 2000; Wallace et al. 2009; Barbeau et al. 2013) to possible ceiling effects in inspection tasks, and advocate standardized processing speed measures.

"The discrepancy between the current findings and the inspection time findings could be due to the inspection tasks producing ceiling effects, and thus it may not have been sensitive enough to detect differences in processing speed in ASD."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id standardized-measures-detect-asd-processing-speed-deficit
title The article attributes the discrepancy with inspection-time studies to methodology, arguing standardized measures are sensitive enough to detect processing speed deficits in ASD
description The article attributes the discrepancy with inspection-time studies to methodology, arguing standardized measures are sensitive enough to detect processing speed deficits in ASD
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — haigh-sarah-m-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.