The article attributes the discrepancy with inspection-time studies to methodology, arguing standardized measures are sensitive enough to detect processing speed deficits in ASD¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The authors interpret the conflicting literature as methodological: inspection-time tasks may produce ceiling effects, and standardized measures better detect clinically-related deficits. → Haigh Sarah M. 2018
Evidence¶
Haigh Sarah M. 2018¶
Haigh Sarah M., Walsh Jennifer A., Mazefsky Carla A., Minshew Nancy J., Eack Shaun M. (2018). Processing Speed is Impaired in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Relates to Social Communication Abilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3515-z
q1 · i? · associational · r2
Authors' interpretation in the Discussion, not a tested result: they attribute the conflict with inspection-time studies (Scheuffgen et al. 2000; Wallace et al. 2009; Barbeau et al. 2013) to possible ceiling effects in inspection tasks, and advocate standardized processing speed measures.
"The discrepancy between the current findings and the inspection time findings could be due to the inspection tasks producing ceiling effects, and thus it may not have been sensitive enough to detect differences in processing speed in ASD."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The processing speed deficit in adults with ASD appears on each of the three standardized subtests: Trail Making A, Symbol Coding, and Category Fluency — related
- Adults with ASD without intellectual disability show a large deficit in composite processing speed versus IQ-matched controls on standardized measures — related
- Processing speed in adults with ASD shows no significant association with SAS-II social adjustment, and only a near-significant positive association with GAF functioning — related
- Studies relying exclusively on the Applied Problems subtest are likely to miss small but meaningful influences on early math achievement because the measure is less sensitive to variation among young children — related
- Slower processing speed in adults with ASD is associated with greater impairment on ADOS Communication and Reciprocal Social Interaction scores — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
standardized-measures-detect-asd-processing-speed-deficit |
title |
The article attributes the discrepancy with inspection-time studies to methodology, arguing standardized measures are sensitive enough to detect processing speed deficits in ASD |
description |
The article attributes the discrepancy with inspection-time studies to methodology, arguing standardized measures are sensitive enough to detect processing speed deficits in ASD |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — haigh-sarah-m-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.