Claims

Standardized, normed writing assessments show a stronger mathematics–writing correlation (r = 0.50) than non-standardized writing assessments (r = 0.31)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q4 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i3 The mathematics–writing correlation was significantly stronger for standardized writing assessments (r = 0.50) than non-standardized ones (r = 0.31). → Young-Suk Grace Kim 2024 q4 i? Whether the mathematics assessment was normed and standardized did not significantly moderate the relation (b = 0.13, p = 0.10). → Young-Suk Grace Kim 2024 (2)

Evidence

Young-Suk Grace Kim 2024

Young-Suk Grace Kim, Dandan Yang, Jinkyung Hwang. (2024). Are Mathematics and Writing Skills Related? Evidence from Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09960-4

q4 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analytic moderation by normed/standardized status of writing assessments. Standardized writing tasks yielded a stronger correlation with mathematics (r = 0.50) than non-standardized tasks (r = 0.31), consistent with measurement-precision reasoning.

"the standardized writing assessments had a significantly stronger correlation with mathematics (r = 0.50, SE = 0.05, p = 0.002) than the non-standardized writing assessments (r = 0.31, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001)."

Young-Suk Grace Kim 2024 (2)

Young-Suk Grace Kim, Dandan Yang, Jinkyung Hwang. (2024). Are Mathematics and Writing Skills Related? Evidence from Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09960-4

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analytic moderation by mathematics assessment standardization. The moderation was not statistically significant; the authors note most mathematics assessments were standardized, so degrees of freedom were quite small.

"whether or not mathematics assessment was normed and standardized did not moderate the relation between mathematics and writing (b = 0.13, SE = 0.06, p = 0.10)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id standardized-writing-tasks-stronger-relation
title Standardized, normed writing assessments show a stronger mathematics–writing correlation (r = 0.50) than non-standardized writing assessments (r = 0.31)
description Standardized, normed writing assessments show a stronger mathematics–writing correlation (r = 0.50) than non-standardized writing assessments (r = 0.31)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — young-suk-grace-kim-2024, young-suk-grace-kim-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.