Standardized, normed writing assessments show a stronger mathematics–writing correlation (r = 0.50) than non-standardized writing assessments (r = 0.31)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q4·i3large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i3 The mathematics–writing correlation was significantly stronger for standardized writing assessments (r = 0.50) than non-standardized ones (r = 0.31). → Young-Suk Grace Kim 2024
q4 i? Whether the mathematics assessment was normed and standardized did not significantly moderate the relation (b = 0.13, p = 0.10). → Young-Suk Grace Kim 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Young-Suk Grace Kim 2024¶
Young-Suk Grace Kim, Dandan Yang, Jinkyung Hwang. (2024). Are Mathematics and Writing Skills Related? Evidence from Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09960-4
q4 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta-analytic moderation by normed/standardized status of writing assessments. Standardized writing tasks yielded a stronger correlation with mathematics (r = 0.50) than non-standardized tasks (r = 0.31), consistent with measurement-precision reasoning.
"the standardized writing assessments had a significantly stronger correlation with mathematics (r = 0.50, SE = 0.05, p = 0.002) than the non-standardized writing assessments (r = 0.31, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001)."
Young-Suk Grace Kim 2024 (2)¶
Young-Suk Grace Kim, Dandan Yang, Jinkyung Hwang. (2024). Are Mathematics and Writing Skills Related? Evidence from Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09960-4
q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?
Meta-analytic moderation by mathematics assessment standardization. The moderation was not statistically significant; the authors note most mathematics assessments were standardized, so degrees of freedom were quite small.
"whether or not mathematics assessment was normed and standardized did not moderate the relation between mathematics and writing (b = 0.13, SE = 0.06, p = 0.10)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mathematics and writing skills are moderately correlated overall (r = 0.48) across 211 studies — related
- The mathematics–writing correlation is stronger in primary grades (r = 0.52) than in university and beyond (r = 0.30) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
standardized-writing-tasks-stronger-relation |
title |
Standardized, normed writing assessments show a stronger mathematics–writing correlation (r = 0.50) than non-standardized writing assessments (r = 0.31) |
description |
Standardized, normed writing assessments show a stronger mathematics–writing correlation (r = 0.50) than non-standardized writing assessments (r = 0.31) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — young-suk-grace-kim-2024, young-suk-grace-kim-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.