Claims

STEM participation (% STEM Courses) and STEM achievement (STEM Grades) are largely distinct outcomes, correlating less than 5% shared variance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 The zero-order correlation between % STEM Courses and STEM Grades was non-significant (r = .119, p = .107); adjusted estimates reached at most r = .191. → Daker 2021

Evidence

Daker 2021

Daker, R.J., Gattas, S.U., Sokolowski, H.M., Green, A.E., & Lyons, I.M. (2021). First-year students' math anxiety predicts STEM avoidance and underperformance throughout university, independently of math ability. npj Science of Learning 6:17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00095-7

q3 · i1 · associational · r2

Correlational analysis in the same 183-student sample: zero-order correlation r = .119 (p = .107); partial correlation controlling for Semesters Absent r = .191 (p = .010). The article concludes the two outcomes are "distinct", justifying separate models; the largest printed effect size is r = .191.

"even the highest of these estimates suggests that less than 5% of the variance in one STEM outcome can be explained by the other. This provides evidence that STEM participation and STEM achievement are distinct"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.