Experimentally labeling a novel activity with a gender-interest stereotype causes 8-year-old girls to report lower interest and choose it less often¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Girls were significantly less interested in the stereotyped than the nonstereotyped novel activity, t(49) = 5.46, P < 0.001, d = 1.10, and only 20% chose the stereotyped activity to take home (P < 0.001). → Master 2021
Evidence¶
Master 2021¶
Master, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Cheryan, S. (2021). Gender stereotypes about interests start early and cause gender disparities in computer science and engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(48), e2100030118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100030118
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Preregistered within-subjects laboratory experiment with 50 8-year-old girls; descriptions of two novel activities were identical except for random assignment of the interest stereotype. The printed effect size was d = 1.10. In the behavioral choice task, only 20% chose the stereotyped activity (binomial proportion test, P < 0.001).
"girls were significantly less interested in the stereotyped activity (in which "girls are less interested than boys") than the nonstereotyped activity (in which "girls and boys are equally interested"), t(49) = 5.46, P < 0.001, and d = 1.10"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Children in grades 3–7 endorse gender-interest stereotypes favoring boys in computer science, with boys endorsing more strongly than girls
- Gender-interest stereotypes create a gender gap in interest in a computer science activity: girls, but not boys, show lower interest when the stereotype is present
- The more girls endorse gender-interest stereotypes favoring boys, the lower their own interest in computer science and engineering, and interest stereotypes predict girls' interest more strongly than ability stereotypes
- Brilliance cues reduce stigmatized students' interest and intrinsic motivation, with effects emerging by age 6–7 and persisting into adulthood — related
- Girls started with lower interest in science than boys but gained significantly more, resulting in equal post-intervention interest — related
- Gender-interest stereotypes favoring boys in computer science and engineering are endorsed across grades 1–12 and across racial/ethnic groups in a diverse sample — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
stereotype-label-causes-lower-girls-interest-novel-activity |
title |
Experimentally labeling a novel activity with a gender-interest stereotype causes 8-year-old girls to report lower interest and choose it less often |
description |
Experimentally labeling a novel activity with a gender-interest stereotype causes 8-year-old girls to report lower interest and choose it less often |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — master-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.