Stimulated recall provides unique information about hypothesis evaluation and meta-reasoning beyond group verbal interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 1996 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Stimulated recall of thinking during the group discussion yields more and unique information about hypothesis evaluation and meta-reasoning than the verbal interaction alone. → de Grave 1996
Evidence¶
de Grave 1996¶
de Grave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. & Schmidt, H. (1996). Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 24(5), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118111
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Thinking processes were tapped by a stimulated recall procedure and the recall protocols analysed alongside interaction transcripts; the recall data "provides more and unique information about hypothesis evaluation and meta-reasoning."
"Stimulated recall of the thinking process during that discusion, however, provides more and unique information about hypothesis evaluation and meta-reasoning."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Conceptual change by students during PBL problem analysis can be made visible in stimulated recall protocols — related
- PBL group discussion during problem analysis mainly concerns theory building, with less data exploration and meta-reasoning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
stimulated-recall-unique-hypothesis-meta-reasoning |
title |
Stimulated recall provides unique information about hypothesis evaluation and meta-reasoning beyond group verbal interaction |
description |
Stimulated recall provides unique information about hypothesis evaluation and meta-reasoning beyond group verbal interaction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
1996 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — de-grave-1996 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.