Claims

Strength is strongly positively correlated with second-pass reading time, while betweenness, harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient are not related to duration measures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Strength shows a strong positive correlation with second-pass reading time (r = 0.645). → Catrysse 2025 q3 i? Betweenness, harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient are not (or only weakly) correlated with first-pass and second-pass duration measures, indicating they capture integration aspects duration measures cannot. → Catrysse 2025

Evidence

Catrysse 2025

Catrysse, L., van Daal, T., Jarodzka, H., Kaakinen, J. K., Donche, V., & Gijbels, D. (2025). How Eye Read: A Social Network Approach. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10000-y

q3 · i3 · associational · r1

Correlational analysis of eye-tracking data from 31 higher education freshmen reading three expository texts; Table 3 reports strength–second-pass r = 0.645, a "strong positive correlation between strength and second-pass reading time", while betweenness correlations were near zero (e.g., 0.022).

"There is a strong positive correlation between strength and second-pass reading time. Betweenness is not correlated with first-pass forward reading time, first-pass rereading time, or second-pass reading time."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id strength-correlates-second-pass-reading-time
title Strength is strongly positively correlated with second-pass reading time, while betweenness, harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient are not related to duration measures
description Strength is strongly positively correlated with second-pass reading time, while betweenness, harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient are not related to duration measures
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — catrysse-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.