Strength is strongly positively correlated with second-pass reading time, while betweenness, harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient are not related to duration measures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Strength shows a strong positive correlation with second-pass reading time (r = 0.645). → Catrysse 2025
q3 i? Betweenness, harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient are not (or only weakly) correlated with first-pass and second-pass duration measures, indicating they capture integration aspects duration measures cannot. → Catrysse 2025
Evidence¶
Catrysse 2025¶
Catrysse, L., van Daal, T., Jarodzka, H., Kaakinen, J. K., Donche, V., & Gijbels, D. (2025). How Eye Read: A Social Network Approach. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10000-y
q3 · i3 · associational · r1
Correlational analysis of eye-tracking data from 31 higher education freshmen reading three expository texts; Table 3 reports strength–second-pass r = 0.645, a "strong positive correlation between strength and second-pass reading time", while betweenness correlations were near zero (e.g., 0.022).
"There is a strong positive correlation between strength and second-pass reading time. Betweenness is not correlated with first-pass forward reading time, first-pass rereading time, or second-pass reading time."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient show no relation with working memory capacity — related
- Mean item response durations show no strong relationship with math motivation and self-efficacy in general — related
- Topic-final sentences show higher harmonic centrality than topic-medial sentences and lower local clustering coefficient than other sentence types — related
- Betweenness centrality decreases as working memory capacity increases — related
- Topic-medial sentences have higher strength than topic-initial and topic-final sentences — related
- Readers with higher working memory capacity make more transitions between sentences (higher strength) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
strength-correlates-second-pass-reading-time |
title |
Strength is strongly positively correlated with second-pass reading time, while betweenness, harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient are not related to duration measures |
description |
Strength is strongly positively correlated with second-pass reading time, while betweenness, harmonic centrality and local clustering coefficient are not related to duration measures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — catrysse-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.