In a control experiment on data of known construction, the check is calibrated, can be passed, and separability from marginals is not fidelity¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Over twenty-four replications the column-permuted synthetic version produced test statistics spread across the interval, consistent with uniformity, showing the check is calibrated. → Inoue 2026
q2 i? A Gaussian copula version passes the check, with coefficient of variation within 3.5% of the real one in all four OULAD presentations. → Inoue 2026 (2)
q2 i? A multivariate normal version separated from its own surrogates more sharply than the real data in every presentation while misstating β0 level and variation, showing separability is not fidelity. → Inoue 2026 (3)
Evidence¶
Inoue 2026¶
Inoue, H., & Yasutake, K. (2026). What Fidelity Metrics Miss: A Structural Check on Synthetic Educational Data. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27265 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27265
q2 · i? · design · r2
Control experiment on four OULAD presentations (376 to 2,049 learners over thirty-nine weeks): the column-permuted synthetic version, a draw from the null, yields uniformly distributed statistics, so "the check is calibrated rather than merely permissive."
"Over twenty-four replications the column-permuted version produced test statistics spread across the interval, from 0.010 to 0.860 with a mean of 0.537, and a test of uniformity does not reject."
Inoue 2026 (2)¶
Inoue, H., & Yasutake, K. (2026). What Fidelity Metrics Miss: A Structural Check on Synthetic Educational Data. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27265. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27265
q2 · i? · design · r2
Of three synthetic versions built from OULAD (column-permuted, multivariate normal, Gaussian copula), only the copula, which preserves the rank correlation of the learner trajectory, recovers the weekly β0 variation: "its coefficient of variation lands within 3.5% of the real one."
"Only the copula reproduces the weekly values themselves: its coefficient of variation lands within 3.5% of the real one in all four presentations, with mean β0 within 6%."
Inoue 2026 (3)¶
Inoue, H., & Yasutake, K. (2026). What Fidelity Metrics Miss: A Structural Check on Synthetic Educational Data. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27265. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27265
q2 · i? · design · r2
The multivariate normal synthetic version was highly distinguishable from its own marginals yet "a poor description of the cohort", misstating β0 level by 28% to 143% and variation by 14% to 38%, establishing that separability is not a measure of fidelity.
"The multivariate normal version separated from its own surrogates more sharply than the real data did in every presentation, by as much as a factor of two, while misstating the level of β0 by between 28% and 143% and its variation by between 14% and 38%."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Real cohorts separate from marginal-preserving surrogates of themselves in all four years, while three of four synthetic cohorts do not — related
- The variation gap traces to what the generator was disclosed: no released statistic constrains which band and which week are zero together — related
- Synthetic cohorts reproduce the level and shape of the weekly β0 partition but vary 2.6–4.9 times less across the term than real cohorts at a common working point — related
- Synthetic cohorts place week-to-week change in the term's examination weeks, which real cohorts do not — related
- Partition descriptors and the component-membership–study-volume association are reproduced by the synthetic cohorts — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
structural-check-calibrated-passable-separability-not-fidelity |
title |
In a control experiment on data of known construction, the check is calibrated, can be passed, and separability from marginals is not fidelity |
description |
In a control experiment on data of known construction, the check is calibrated, can be passed, and separability from marginals is not fidelity |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
3 — inoue-2026, inoue-2026-2, inoue-2026-3 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.