Claims

In a control experiment on data of known construction, the check is calibrated, can be passed, and separability from marginals is not fidelity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Over twenty-four replications the column-permuted synthetic version produced test statistics spread across the interval, consistent with uniformity, showing the check is calibrated. → Inoue 2026 q2 i? A Gaussian copula version passes the check, with coefficient of variation within 3.5% of the real one in all four OULAD presentations. → Inoue 2026 (2) q2 i? A multivariate normal version separated from its own surrogates more sharply than the real data in every presentation while misstating β0 level and variation, showing separability is not fidelity. → Inoue 2026 (3)

Evidence

Inoue 2026

Inoue, H., & Yasutake, K. (2026). What Fidelity Metrics Miss: A Structural Check on Synthetic Educational Data. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27265 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27265

q2 · i? · design · r2

Control experiment on four OULAD presentations (376 to 2,049 learners over thirty-nine weeks): the column-permuted synthetic version, a draw from the null, yields uniformly distributed statistics, so "the check is calibrated rather than merely permissive."

"Over twenty-four replications the column-permuted version produced test statistics spread across the interval, from 0.010 to 0.860 with a mean of 0.537, and a test of uniformity does not reject."

Inoue 2026 (2)

Inoue, H., & Yasutake, K. (2026). What Fidelity Metrics Miss: A Structural Check on Synthetic Educational Data. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27265. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27265

q2 · i? · design · r2

Of three synthetic versions built from OULAD (column-permuted, multivariate normal, Gaussian copula), only the copula, which preserves the rank correlation of the learner trajectory, recovers the weekly β0 variation: "its coefficient of variation lands within 3.5% of the real one."

"Only the copula reproduces the weekly values themselves: its coefficient of variation lands within 3.5% of the real one in all four presentations, with mean β0 within 6%."

Inoue 2026 (3)

Inoue, H., & Yasutake, K. (2026). What Fidelity Metrics Miss: A Structural Check on Synthetic Educational Data. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27265. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27265

q2 · i? · design · r2

The multivariate normal synthetic version was highly distinguishable from its own marginals yet "a poor description of the cohort", misstating β0 level by 28% to 143% and variation by 14% to 38%, establishing that separability is not a measure of fidelity.

"The multivariate normal version separated from its own surrogates more sharply than the real data did in every presentation, by as much as a factor of two, while misstating the level of β0 by between 28% and 143% and its variation by between 14% and 38%."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id structural-check-calibrated-passable-separability-not-fidelity
title In a control experiment on data of known construction, the check is calibrated, can be passed, and separability from marginals is not fidelity
description In a control experiment on data of known construction, the check is calibrated, can be passed, and separability from marginals is not fidelity
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — inoue-2026, inoue-2026-2, inoue-2026-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.